Battlezone Universe
March 13, 2010, 01:10:48 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: BZUniverse Home - BZ2MD - BZScrap - TimeDisruptor
 
   Home   Help Rules Search Groups Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Idea for a new mission type  (Read 393 times)
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
VSMIT
Global Moderator
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 969


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2009, 01:33:04 PM »

How about mpi with 2 human recyclers with 2 human commanders against 1 insanely fortified enemy base.
(Human commanders seperated into team 1 and team 2 as of in USMC 4 Play team 1 and 2 co-op vs team 3 and 4)

EDIT: Might require new map. Very big map.
Sounds like a different version of a GH map.
Logged

I find that if I don't have a signature, some people disregard the last couple of lines of a long post.
Quote from: Lizard
IQ's have really dropped around here just recently, must be something in the water.
Scav-Avenger
Sober Scavenger
***
Posts: 21

Scav today, Scrap tomorrow.


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2009, 08:57:59 AM »

Yea something like it.

I also have an idea to make up for scion's lack of a training facility.
The scion armory will be able to lauch boxes that contain a single pilot (spawns a pilot when reaches ground). This enables the scion to lauch pilots to newly sniped ships at a distance for a small scrap cost (10 or 20 scrap). This will not overpower the scion as its the only way pilots are avaliable and can more or less make up for the constant supply of pilots in a small radius around the ISDF's training centre.

Could be added in the form of the same way a pilot ejects out of a vehicle perhaps without the upwards flying motion.
Logged

Avatars make my profile look fat...
VSMIT
Global Moderator
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 969


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2009, 09:12:13 AM »

Part of the reason there is no Scion training facility is because their numbers are too small for it to be used effectively.  This makes you think twice about leaving an empty ship in your base.
Logged

I find that if I don't have a signature, some people disregard the last couple of lines of a long post.
Quote from: Lizard
IQ's have really dropped around here just recently, must be something in the water.
TheJamsh
Attila
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3764



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2009, 10:35:35 AM »

And i doubt their small numbers would like to be launched 3-4 kilometres away inside a crate Smiley

Its actually surprisingly difficult to get non-powerup's to launch from an armoury succesfully. High-speed is a must, because otherwise most of youre objects will crash into cliff sides or get dragged accross the top of buildings. The Service and Speeder crates in my variant for example, and Steeveeo's nukes, have to be launched at high speed, or they will get sucked back down to the ground.

Haven't quite figured out why that is yet, something to do with collision meshes. Try placing an SRV missile launcher right in the corner closest to the enemy in hilo, majority of the time, the nuke WILL hit the terrain, and result in framerate munching base death.

Therefore, scion crate lifts are out of the question Tongue
Logged


Click Me
Red Spot
Sabre
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 445



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 09, 2009, 11:41:54 AM »

How about mpi with 2 human recyclers with 2 human commanders against 1 insanely fortified enemy base.
(Human commanders seperated into team 1 and team 2 as of in USMC 4 Play team 1 and 2 co-op vs team 3 and 4)

EDIT: Might require new map. Very big map.

In my todo list I've got a bit about setting up a shell-option to allow for that(though I'm not sure it would be all that great an option*), also thought about the same for the AI but I dropped it as it would mean you have 2 identical AI teams or it becomes too much work(Just thinking about AIPs).

Anyway, I would be glad to brainstorm a bit about the subject and see what and how it might/should work.

*It means you also need more dedicated players, seeing the mayority of MPI-games I've been in I doubt it would work very well if an option is included that means teamplay becomes more important. (Think about 1 commander snatching all pools, or 1 team receiving all AI-attacks and not getting any support from the other team, ......)
Logged

*Something intelligent, yet funny*
Warfreak
Attila
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1024


*Scavanger at heart*


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: July 09, 2009, 12:00:42 PM »

Wouldn't a Hmn + Hmn Team VS. AI actually require a different .dll?

1. AI would have to be able to pull out 2 different AIP sets at the same time and execute BOTH simultaneously.
2. The Defeat Conditions would have to be that BOTH bases are annihilated. (I.E. Both Recyclers and Factories.)
3. AI would have to have more specific and strategic AIPs in order to be able to effectively take on multiple bases and armies.
4. MAPS would need to be HUGE for this kind of play and have a generous amount of pools/scrap fields.
5. Consideration of how the thugs would be distributed would need to be taken aswell. Also remember that THE max amount of thugs per team IS 4 for MPI. In testing, we couldnt get more than 8 people ingame in a Strat game, that may have changed however.

6. We would need a C++ programmer willing to do all this.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!